Anita
True man Pickett:
Free
Thought Preacher
by Lyn
Burnstine
UNITARIAN
UNIVERSALIST WOMEN’S HERITAGE SOCIETY
June, 1995
Acknowledgements
The material for this
paper came from Anita Trueman Pickett’s personal diaries and
unpublished autobiography, “Grandmanita’s Youth”,
which were generously shared with me by her family members. I am
grateful to her daughters — the late Estelle Pickett Coggins
and the late Laurel Pickett Stackpole — and to her
granddaughters, Carol Coggins Powell, Debbie Stackpole Merritt and
the late Anita Stackpole Dougan, for their generosity, hospitality
and encouragement.
My thanks go also to
ATP’s grandson, John Pickett, who, with his wife, Judy, have
extended an invitation to study the diaries in their keeping for
further research toward the full book I hope to write about Anita. I
can’t leave out David Stackpole, who first brought Anita
Trueman Pickett, his grandmother, to our fellowship in Ulster County.
My brief acquaintance in 1959-60 with the gracious but modest lady
set the stage for my consuming desire to share her amazing life story
with others. My gratitude to David, who became a personal friend in
those long-ago years, is also for his inadvertent launching of my
lifelong pursuit of folk music as a career and passion—a fact
unknown to him for nearly 30 years, until the research on his
grandmother led to re— establishing contact.
And to the many friends
and acquaintances who have kept encouraging me through long periods
of “silence,” to those enthusiastic participants in the
three staged readings about ATP at our fellowship, and, especially,
to those who have said, when my courage faltered, “You CAN and
you MUST write Anita’s story,” I bless you and promise
you a longer telling of her story.
I have included some
quotes from assorted newspaper clippings, from Harold Pickett’s
diary, and some facts gleaned from interviews with family members.
Anita’s published
works are:
Anton Angels: a
Romance; Aceon: a Tale of the Soul’s Experience; Aceon and
Other Poems; (originally published as Philo-Sophia) and The Science
of True Living, all published by the Alliance Publishing Company
in New York City before 1902, and
How Luke Discovered
Christmas, published by Beacon Press, Boston, in 1950.
Lyn
Burnstine, 1994
INTRODUCTION
“Miss Anita
Trueman is probably one of the most remarkable young women in the
country.”
Baltimore
Sunday Herald (circa 1900)
“The girl is
wonderful. There is some divine power back of it all.., some great
mind of past ages living again in her.”
Ella
Wheeler Wilcox
“Silence is made
for you to break, oh, silver-tongued breaker of the silence.”
Richard
LeGallienne
These comments
reflected the turn-of-the-century public’s opinion of the young
woman, Anita Trueman, then in her late teens and early twenties. At
an uncommonly early age, she was an established and respected public
speaker, poet, author, ardent Single Tax advocate, and preacher of
“Free Thought” philosophy. She was a protege of the poets
Edwin Markham and Ella Wheeler Wilcox, of Swami Abhedananda (one of
the founders of the Vedanta movement in America), and of the
world-famed naturalist and author, John Burroughs. We are fortunate
to have her own words recording this amazing lifeboth in diaries and
in an unpublished autobiography, written for her grandchildren upon
retiring to her family’s home in Kingston, New York.
Anita Trueman was a
woman far ahead of her time in her independence and feminism, yet she
was a product of her time. She found society’s attitudes toward
women to be a constant source of frustration and conflict. Her
struggle was ongoing: between calling and kinder, between career and
kitchen, between the dream and reality. She resisted marriage until
her late twenties, knowing intuitively that it would present these
conflicts. Yet she yearned so desperately for love and family that
she eagerly embraced the opportunity for both when presented in the
person of Harold Pickett, a fellow divinity student at Meadville
Theological School in Pennsylvania. For that family life she risked
the circumscription that she feared, and which, indeed, marriage and
children proved to be for her. Anita loved her family devotedly, yet
her diary was the friend who heard her cries of the battles she
continually waged in the conflict between the domestic
responsibilities to those dear ones and the role she felt she was put
on this earth to fill: spiritual leader.
Anita intended to write
a book of which she says (in “Grandmanita’s Youth”,
her autobiography, written in her 70s):
Never
a line of it was written... [about].. .that type of woman the world
so little understands. ...She is the sacrifice needed to bridge over
one era to another in the world’s history. When the new order
is established, our granddaughters ought to have some record of the
revolution which brought them liberty.. ..What is the woman of the
future to do with the woman of the past? We are the builders of the
world, yet we must use the material at hand in its construction.... I
know the world’s need of great, free souls, and I will play
that part, but I am determined to live the sweetness of a wholesome
womanhood as well.
Here, then, is the
story of a truly singular woman and her spiritual journey, told
mostly in her own words.
When Annie Trueman (later to be called Anita) was born on May 17,
1881, to Fanny and William (Willie) Trueman in Cleveland, Ohio, the
attending physician presented the new mother with a fragrant bunch of
lilies-of-the-valley. For as long as she lived, Fanny always sent a
box of these blooms to her daughter on her birthday.
While working in a
cabinet shop in Cleveland, Willie made a neat, polished box to
hold their savings. Ten
months after the new baby’s arrival, the box contained just
enough to pay for
passage on a cattle ship back to their native England, a long-awaited
event. So the first decade of Anita Trueman’s life was spent in
Birmingham, England, amidst an extended family of Truemansdevout
Plymouth Brethren--about whom Anita later wrote:
The
overwhelming preoccupation…seemed to be salvation hereafter,
and a very real conflict with a personal devil day by day. I knew I
was very wicked, and yet I was sure I was saved. I loved to testify
in the meetings of the Plymouth Brethren when permitted to do so, and
I was very much concerned about the salvation of my beloved
Grandfather Trueman [who]...was not saved, according to grandmother
and the Plymouth Brethren. If I talked back, I had to stand in a
corner with my back to the room, saying over and over again to the
Devil, ‘Come down, Proud Spirit.’
Thus the first step in
Anita’s spiritual journey was undertaken with these English
Quakers. For a time, the Truemans lived next door to a “wicked
Unitarian Church.” It would be many years before her spiritual
path led her to Unitarianism and her own ordination as a minister in
that denomination. During one of William Trueman’s several
trips back to the United States while working for the Lancaster
Company, makers of fine photographic apparatus, he embraced the ideas
of the noted agnostic Col. Robert Ingersoll. For that he was formally
disowned by the Plymouth Brethren.
Upon returning to live
in America in 1891, the Truemans set up their home in Brooklyn, where
the sensitive, serious, overweight child suffered greatly from
classmates’ cruel teasing about her British accent and
mannerisms —“twisting the lion’s tail.” Years
later, a beloved teacher from those days attended one of Anita’s
lectures and remembered that she “had expected some unusual
development in such an odd child.” They laughed together over
Anita’s habit of getting her paperwork done as swiftly as
possible “in order to lay my head down on the desk and THINK.
Such mooning was not permitted at home.”
For a year Anita
attended a Methodist Mission Sunday School where there was much
praying for her soul by those who knew her father was an agnostic and
an Ingersoll convert. Finally, Anita and her father found common
ground in reading Emerson, and she “made a ceremony of going.
..to confess that I was really a Transcendentalist, and could never
join the Methodist Church.”
When Anita delivered
her valedictory at the Brooklyn Elementary School in February, 1896,
her topic was “The Responsibility of the Rising Generation.”
She later wrote, “ There is nothing original or promising about
it, yet I recall that delivering it was one of the thrills of my
life. Little did I dream then that it was to be the first of several
thousand such appearances. My generation did not fulfill my dream,
but I certainly did mine.”
William Trueman scorned
formal education, once commenting that he “knew as much about
college as a cow does about Sunday,” although his reading
habits had made him a learned man. After Anita’s graduation
from grammar school, he encouraged her to be his partner in a new
enterprise that he had undertaken—a woodworking shop. “For
the first time,” she says, “I realized how much he had
always wished I were a boy, and I tried to fill the bill as a worker,
as well as in sharing his intellectual life [they grew very close
together in those days]. ...I enjoyed the long ride to work in the
morning. ..and even more the return trip in the evening. Dad went to
work earlier than I, and on my way I would read my stint of
Ingersoll, Emerson, Carlyle, or Edward Bellamy, and in the evening
Dad and I would talk it over on the way home. It was not yet possible
to talk of these things as a family.”
In the fall, her mother
insisted on taking Anita’s place in the shop and sending her to
high school. While her mother worked in the shop, Anita also became
the caretaker for her younger sister, Gertrude, born prematurely and
with spinal anomalies that made her a semi-invalid (the only one of
three siblings to survive).
During the winter,
Anita had a first and traumatic visit to an oculist, who told
her she could never be
a scholar because she must not use her eyes for long periods of time.
She says in her diary:
The
crisis was spiritual as well as physical. I remember kneeling beside
the window of the Bushwick Ave. flat, pouring out my heart in prayer
about it. I gazed at the moon and after a second it became two moons.
It was true. I could not keep m’ eye focused. I could never be
a scholar. Then a vast comfort flowed _o i from the night. The Spirit
of Life seemed to say, ‘Be patient, child. You will find your
work. Book- learning would be a handicap to you rather than a help.
This limitation is a blessing in disguise.’
Anita’s several
published books, her long and illustrious career as a lecturer, and
her years in the pulpit of the Unitarian Church might later serve to
contradict that prediction, but, indeed, her finest efforts were
always unscripted public presentations (whether lectures or sermons).
Eye-strain would always be a problem for her, and perhaps was a
contributing factor in her ability to speak so excitingly and well
without a script.
During this time, Anita
rebelled against the educational process to which she was subjected
in the Brooklyn school--”accumulating dates and records,
without much reference to their human significance...just getting the
pupils through the examinations.. .and [implementing] discipline
devoted to keeping the building clean and orderly, and preventing the
girls from having anything to do with the students in the Boys’
High School, a few blocks away.” In her efforts to promote the
theory that education should prepare students for a destiny of
transforming the world, and to unfold their potentialities through
training in the art of thinking, she was squelched by school
authorities.
However, W. J. Colville
invited her to use his platform at the Brooklyn College of Music and
Metaphysics to present a lecture on “The True Philosophy of
Education.” Colville, a prolific lecturer and preacher of the
metaphysical gospel of spiritual freedom and fellowship, had become a
family friend and supporter of Anita’s writing and public
speaking, through the Trueman family’s attendance at The Church
of Individual Domination. Its minister, Francis E. Mason, an early
associate of Mary Baker Eddy, preached a dynamic doctrine there:
.to
feel the vital force of divinity within us, and to use it creatively.
He taught us to feel at home in the boundless universe, ready to face
our own problems confidently. He made us feel sure that Truth, if
served by courageous souls, can recreate the chaotic world into the
Kingdom of Heaven.
For once the Truemans
had found a spiritual home that satisfied all mother,
father, and daughters.
Colville, a frequent lecturer at Mason’s church, often called
on Anita to take his place when he was away. She says:
Mysticism
had broken out in many forms during that decade. Swami Vivekananda
had captured the Parliament of Religions at the World’s Fair in
1892. Psychic research had become a dignified occupation. So it was
not surprising that I spoke with authority, and commanded a hearing.
The contacts with Mason
and Colville were important steps toward Anita’s career as a
lecturer, but the one that most determined the trend of her life came
when Henry George, writer, economist and social philosopher, was
nominated by the Jeffersonian Democrats as candidate for the
Mayoralty of Greater New York. Author of many books, George was most
famous for Progress and Poverty, published in 1880 and subtitled “An
Inquiry Into the Cause of Industrial Depressions and Of Increase Of
Want With Increase Of Wealth.” The frontispiece reads: “To
those who, seeing the vice and misery that spring from the unequal
distribution of wealth and privilege, feel the possibility of a
higher social state and would strive for its attainment.”
Although his ideas were
contrary to the teachings of the accepted political economy of the
time, George’s books sold in the millions, and his followers
loyally advanced his theories for decades.
Anita chronicles this
chapter of her life in her autobiography thus:
Our
city was to be incorporated as a Borough in the new Municipality, and
a large proportion of New Yorkers lived in Brooklyn, so the Campaign
was coming to our very door. My father had been given charge of the
Greenpoint sector with his shop as headquarters. He wanted me to
write a campaign poem. That night I wrote ‘The Advance of the
People.’ We had become ardent Single Taxers....We had read
Progress and Poverty with delight in its clarity and completeness.
Although my father was not yet a citizen and I was a minor female, we
swung into the campaign with enthusiasm. We knew there was small
chance of electing our candidate, but we shared his feeling that here
was a wonderful chance for political education....Single Taxers had
gathered from all over the country, paying their own expenses for the
privilege of sharing in this campaign. We all rejoiced in this chance
to preach Henry George’s gospel of equal opportunity to all,
full reward to craftsman or artist in the possession of the fruits of
his effort, and ample support for community activities and
improvements, through a single tax on land values.
Anita adds that she
recited her poem and gave impromptu talks at the street meetings. She
felt the joy of martyrdom when some women in the crowd called her a
“bold hussy,” and she enjoyed the audible admiration of
her new red plush jacket and matching tam with three small upright
ostrich plumes, “Prince o’ Wales style.” Her
teachers, however, took a dim view of these activities, especially
since, before the campaign, she had held one of the highest averages
ever recorded in the Brooklyn Girls’ High School. Their
pleading to “keep out of politics” fell on deaf ears. To
Anita, the campaign was not politics but reform and, as such,
commanded her loyalty.
When writing her
autobiography in her 70s, she commented that she believed it was a
better education for her than any school could give and wondered what
comparable satisfactions her classmates had gained. “At the
same time,” she says, “having seen my own children grow
up, I can fully appreciate the annoyance and anxiety which I caused
my teachers and my parents in those days.”
Henry George’s
sudden death, the night before Anita was scheduled to introduce him
at a pre-election meeting, ended his candidacy. At that meeting,
several leaders
of the movement,
overcome with grief, tried to speak but faltered and could not go on.
Anita writes:
Then
a great power seemed to rise within me, and I took the floor. ‘This
is what Henry George would say to you if he could speak,’ I
began, and went on passionately to urge them to carry on the work. ft
was just what the others had been trying to say, but they were older
and more weary. My eager dedication of my own youth seemed to hearten
them. When I sat down, one of them took from a bookshelf a copy of
Progress and Poverty and read the closing pages, one of the greatest
sermons ever penned.
At the same time that
Anita was developing a sense of mission brought on by her Single Tax
involvement, she was also delving into the meaning of individual
existence. Mason’s
vigorous preaching and Colville’s metaphysics had opened up an
inner world to her which made the Brooklyn Girls’ School and
the Truemans’ dingy flat “seem merely external
incidentals.” One day as she was helping with domestic
chores, drawing a pail
of fresh water to scrub the floors, she was reminded of a brook
rippling over stones on a wooded hillside:
Instantly
that cosmic sense which I had been cultivating in my meditations
responded to the picture. Yes! Even this water that tumbles out of
the faucet, even the dirty water I pour down the sink, is part of an
endless fluid movement of all matter. Silver clouds in the summer sun
are part of the circle. Lines of blank verse were dancing five-footed
across my imagination as I went back to my scrubbing and finished the
task in an exalted dream.
Anita wrote about this
vision in a poem called “The Fall of Man,” in which she
formulated her Emersonian theory of human existence--that we are all
part of the “Universal Mind,” our only differences due to
the depth and range of consciousness:
Some
of its figures were taken from the Bible story of Creation.., but the
Vision behind the poem was more cosmic than any Scriptures. Through
the years it has remained constant with me. All religious and
spiritual movements I have since encountered seem to me to serve that
one central truth... .Later I tried to embody my Vision in a
geometrical diagram, and built this into a story called ‘Ruth’s
Idea’...it serves to record the philosophy which I had shaped
for myself at sixteen.
This literal
description of the Vision became and remained the foundation of her
work, leading to five courses of lectures, illustrated with her
“Center Diagram” that was painted on a roll-up
blackboard—part of her lecture equipment for many years. In her
later life she wrote:
As
I reflect on it from the vantage of my 78th year, I am well satisfied
that it was a good philosophy to live and teach. It has made my whole
life fascinating, and enhanced its precious moments. It has carried
me through periods of tragedy, and it stands by me in these days when
the physical organism is losing its resiliency. Having shared in the
creative life of my universe, having drifted through periods of
weakness and pain, I know the meaning of Life’s great rhythms,
and flow with them toward the ultimate unity.
The Anthony Company,
for whom William Trueman had been doing repairs and experimental work
in his Brooklyn shop, now sent him to manage their New Haven factory.
The Trueman home became a center of philosophical and economic
discussion. The Single Tax Club that they organized became a real
power in New Haven. With her father’s blessing, Anita’s
formal schooling ended after her seventeenth birthday. Speaking
engagements began to proliferate in New Haven and surrounding towns.
William’s natural gift for speaking and writing, echoed in his
precocious daughter, blossomed in New Haven, and scarcely a week went
by when he did not supply what he called “mental pablum”
to the local papers. Anita wrote that her own letters of the period
“revealed the strange child that I was, born grown up in
certain ways, and destined never to grow up in others.” More
importantly, these letters became a means for her to meet many
stellar literary figures of the time, as she wrote to them on behalf
of the Single Tax movement.
9
The popular poet, Ella
Wheeler Wilcox, wrote a daily editorial, usually in verse, for the
sensational but widely-read newspaper, The New York World. She had
supported Henry George, and often expressed Single Tax ideas in her
column. A
newspaperwoman
attending Anita’s parlor talks offered to introduce them at a
luncheon. Mrs. Wilcox
was evidently impressed with the young girl, because she
invited her to go home
with her that night to ‘The Bungalow’ on the rocky shore
at Branford, CT.
The
Sunday after the luncheon at which I met her, The New York World
carried an article with my picture, quoting E.W.W. as saying, “The
girl is wonderful. There is some divine power back of it all, some
great mind of past ages, living again in her.” These words of
the woman who had so much influence in American homes at that time
had important results in my life. Not only did they attract
audiences, and predispose them to listen to me respectfully, but they
created a pattern for my own thinking. I have never escaped from the
feeling of being very young, and when I spoke with authority, I felt
the attitude expressed by Jesus, “It is not I that speak, but
the Father that dwelleth in me.”
In March of 1899, Anita
joined the Single Tax Letter Writing Corps.
My
first assignment was to write to the author of ‘The Man with
the Hoe.’ Although Edwin Markham was a man in his late forties,
and had written some delightful poetry while engaged in education, it
was this poem which made him a national figure. So I wrote him a
four-page letter on my Remington typewriter... It concludes thus:
“The Single Tax cause needs writers and poets, men and women of
ardent purpose and earnest thought. You should be among their ranks.
For want of a great poet, bloody wars have been fought, and ghastly
rebellions have watered beautiful countries with blood. Ella Wheeler
Wilcox, our Queen of Poesy here in the East stands hand in hand with
us. There is work for you to do, and the time is ripe. ”I
mailed the letter to Oakland, Cal, and felt that I had done my duty.
Little did I realize what rich fruit this seed would bear in my life.
Markham responded,
assuring Anita of his sympathy with her protest against social
injustice: “It has done me good to read your ardent and
vigorous letter. There are a few men and women scattered abroad
throughout the world who are alive with the Social Passion. They are
the salt of the earth, they are the hope of social progress. The Holy
truth that they are building on the earth will, in coming days, be a
sea-wall against the tides of anarchy and disorder” Anita wrote
to Markham again, closing her letter: “It may interest you to
know that I am writing this letter on my eighteenth birthday. My
earnestness evidently led you to believe me older. But my youth does
not prevent me from being ardently devoted to the cause of humanity,
and I have had wonderful success in my work as a writer and public
lecturer. I am very pleased to know you, and hope that you will write
to me again”
She met Markham a year
later, and in March, 1901, spent a few days with him and his wife at
their Staten Island home. While they constructed an important poem,
she watched over Virgil, their young son. Mr. Markham and Virgil
accompanied her on the ferry back to New York. She says:
Virgil
was between us, straining to get out of the window. Papa, holding on
to his skirts, quoted for me a quatrain which he had written that
morning for the baby.
“There
are three green eggs in a small brown pocket And the breeze will
swing and the gale will rock it, ‘Til three little birds on the
thin edge teeter, And our God will be glad and our world will be
sweeter.”
Anita wrote that
Markham, “...liked my prose better than my poetry, but since I
wanted to express myself in that form, he very kindly helped me, as
he did dozens of other aspirants.”
Another public figure
who was influential in Anita’s spiritual growth was Swami
Abhedananda, the successor of Swami Vivekananda, a disciple of the
great saint, Ramakrishna. Swami Vivekananda had been sent to the
Parliament of Religions at the World’s Fair in Chicago, in
1892, to represent Hinduism.
In the wake of his tour
of America, Vedanta Societies were formed in several large cities.
When Vivekananda became ill, Abhedananda was sent to take his place
as head of the New York Society. There Anita met him at the home of
Dr. Egbert Guernsey on Central Park South in Manhattan. Dr.
Guernsey’s daughter Florence had given Swami Abhedananda a copy
of Anita’s poems. “I do not remember how I had learned of
the Hindu theory of reincarnation,” Anita wrote, “but I
had used it in my poem, “Aceon,”...and others. It seemed
to offer a reasonable explanation of the many types of personality,
and their different degrees of development, and of the seeming
injustice and incompleteness of human experience. I knew that
Theosophists presented it only as a ‘hypothesis,’ and it
was in this way that I had used it in my poems. It had a place in my
Cosmic Scheme. ..In Abhedenanda’s philosophy, a
nineteen-year-old girl with such a well-established understanding of
truth and such a strong sense of mission in sharing it with others,
must be, as E.W.W. had said, an ‘old soul.’ She might
need discipline and direction. But spiritually we were comrades from
the beginning.”
Both the young poet and
the Swami lectured at a summer gathering in Maine. “It was
there in the grove of tall pines,” Anita recalled, “that
we spent an evening in silence, watching the moon climb the sky, and
when we rose to go back to the hotel, Swamiji kissed me. It was just
so, with no passion, no desire, no regret. The earth and the heavens
had given us of their holiest, and that kiss was the seal of a
supreme experience. It left no embarrassment in our relationship.
Although Abhedananda
never questioned Anita’s call to her work, he wrote her a
letter warning of its dangers.
My
dear child, ...I am glad to hear that the work you are doing is
meeting with such a great success everywhere... .Do not be guided by
ambition. Do not be puffed up with vanity. ...Do not think for a
moment that it is YOUR work, and that these are YOUR students. Do not
think that you are a teacher. First learn to be a true disciple. No
one has ever become the true teacher without becoming a true and
faithful disciple of some spiritual master. Even Christ himself had
to become a disciple first....You are doing a good work, no doubt,
but I know that you are still a child in spiritual life... .May
Divine Mother bless you. Abhedananda
Anita lived in the
Vedanta house one winter while lecturing for the Liberal Leagues in
New York. “It was a great comfort to have that haven of
silence, that battery of spiritual force, behind me,” she
wrote. “Often I would go into Swamiji’s study for a few
moments of devotion with him before taking up the cudgels with my
argumentative audience. Swamiji never failed me, but often he laughed
with me over the vanity of all this.” Later Abhedananda
returned to India to build up the Brotherhood which would become the
backbone of Ghandi’s movement.
In the summer of 1903,
Anita befriended John Burroughs, the Catskill Mountains’
ultimate naturalist and author of 27 books of nature essays. The
first time she went to Slabsides, his rustic cabin, Burroughs was not
at home, but the place itself made a deep impression on Anita:
This
is the rustic home of John Burroughs, the heaven of birds. I think
the birds have religions, and one of them teaches that there is a
heaven, where the souls of good birds go, to hold communion with the
great Lover of Birds, a place which he has prepared for them. He is
away just now, but the cottage, like a nest among the trees, is
redolent of the fragrance of his personality. Below me, here in the
sunlight, spreads the famous celery patch, its bright green obscuring
the rich black earth of the ancient lake-bed. Around the rustic
porch, the trees cluster so closely that only scattered glimpses of
the landscape are caught between their leaves. But the hills tower
high on every side. The noisy world is beyond them. Here only the
sighing wind and the songs of birds are heard.
Anita met Burroughs
unexpectedly at the Post Office on August 17. He had heard about her
preaching and was, Anita thought, “a little quizzical, for his
own religion was extra mural,” but he invited her to Slabsides
the next day. Anita describes one of the many such visits in her
diary entry for September 25, 1903.
I
went up to Slabsides, to seek Mr. Burroughs. He was not there... .1
then made bold to enter the sacred precincts of the Burroughs town
place. Passing the stone house, I wandered down to where the study
nestles under the crest of the hill, overlooking the Hudson. There I
found the dear old man, among a disorderly pile of books and papers.
He was delighted to see me, and we had a very amiable conversation.
He is evidently deeply interested in me. How fortunate I am to have
such friends really care for me... .Returning to Slabsides, we built
a fire on the wide hearth. Then we watched the blaze in alternate
talk and silence. The poet told the history of his poem “Waiting,”
which was written when he was twenty-five. He wrote out a copy of it
for me, on his rustic table, while I watched and tended the fire.
Another entry in her
diary reads:
Yesterday,
I went down to West Park, and spent the day with John Burroughs. I
found him suffering from an aching head, and very sad. He grows weary
of the endless procession of people that pass him by, or press around
him, without answering his heart’s cry for comradeship. I
cannot tell why he should love me so, but yesterday he seemed to need
me very much. I cured his headache for him, and he seemed to find
balm for his sorrows in my companionship. He still keeps my books on
his table, and talks kindly of me to our mutual friends.
Besides her more
intimate friendships, already chronicled, Anita speaks of meeting
other people of renown. A partial list includes: Ralph Waldo Trine,
Clarence Darrow, William Jennings Bryan, Clara Barton, Helen Keller
and Annie Sullivan, the DeMillesAgnes and Cecil B., Richard
LeGalliene, Carrie Nation, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, William Beebe,
Susan B. Anthony, William James, Charlotte Perkins Gilman, Alexander
Graham Bell, Emma Goldman, Antoinette Brown Blackwell, Belva
Lockwood, Elbert Hubbard, and Henry George. Additionally, she told of
meeting people whose names are familiar because of their inventions,
such as Louis Waterman of fountain pen fame and Joseph Fels, inventor
of Fels-Naptha soap. James Hare, the first American war photographer,
was her father’s close friend, and she worked for a time for
Charles Brodie Patterson, the leader of the New Thought Movement. The
interchange of ideas with many of these fine minds served as
stimulation and education for this young woman. Anita’s
writings show that she was entranced with these powerful public
figures. Probably they, too, were honored to count Anita Trueman
among their friends if the following newspaper reviews accurately
reflect the world’s view of her:
The New York World
says: “Only eighteen years old, heir to philosophy of all ages.
Besides being a philosopher, Miss Trueman is a poet. ...She has made
a sensation before Theosophical societies, labor conventions,
teachers’ associations and orthodox religious meetings. Even
college professors have pronounced her utterances remarkable for so
young a person.”
The Washington Post
reports: “Possibly the most characteristic feature of the
discourse was her admirable poise. Paderewski’s principal power
over his audiences is in his immediate assumption that he dominates
it, and this may be said to be precisely the case with Miss Trueman.”
The New York Herald
review reads as follows: “She is pretty, with roguish looks,
said to be Plato’s reincarnation; lectures off-hand on any
subject. Her audiences are in touch with her soul.”
And The Philadelphia
North American has this to say: “Miss Trueman is only a
girl, and yet gray-haired men and women sit spell-bound, while in
words always clear and earnest and sometimes impassioned, this girl
teaches them their duty to themselves and to their fellowmen.”
So thoroughly did Anita leave that life behind her after her marriage
and motherhood, that she reports in her diary a time when Trueman,
her son, looking over some of her old letters, says, “Why the
deuce don’t you keep acquainted with some of these famous
people, so there’d be some chance for the rest of us to know
somebody worthwhile?” Her literary aside was “Why,
indeed? Partly because ‘the rest of us’ require my time
and attention.”
While lecturing and
preaching extensively at such diverse places as The People’s
Church in Philadelphia, The Metaphysical Club in Bosmn, Roycroft in
Aurora, New York, The Sahier Sanitarium in Kingston, New York,
liberal Leagues, The People’s Institute Clubs, The Circle of
Divine Ministry in Washington D.C. and the School for New Thought in
New York City—Anita found her true place in the world. She
says:
The
work in Pittsburgh [the Unitarian Church] was the highest fulfillment
of my individual mission, and it led me into the security and liberty
of the Unitarian ministry. This took me to Meadville [the Unitarian
Theological School in Pennsylvania] where I found the perfect love.
Anita’s single
years were not without romantic entanglements, but oftener than not,
they did not measure up to the “cosmic romance” she
sought. At one point, having suffered several disappointments in
love, she seriously considered—at her father’s
suggestion—having a deliberate single motherhood. She described
her thoughts concerning that venture:
Why
must I wait ‘til the man comes who will share life and the work
with me?...Why must I wait for my motherhood until I find the
conventional conditions congenially provided? Why must a woman barter
her freedom for the privilege of motherhood? I’m growing to
scorn conventions for their cruelty to women, and I feel the blood of
heroes in my veins.
She prays, as she often
does, to:
Dear
Mother Divine, I trust all things with thee. Am I to be the voice of
a new freedom?...for the sake of all unrealized motherhood, for the
sake of truth and love and freedom, this thing must be done. I am
ready, if it is thy will, dear Mother, to place all in the balance.
Make me brave enough to support my convictions, and if the conditions
are not complete, grant me patience to wait.
When the man whom she
had chosen to father this child lost courage and withdrew, she wrote:
I
must go back to the work, the work I came into the world to do. There
alone is peace, and real self-expression for me. All other
associations deny me and fling me back to the path from which I’m
so prone to wander. 0 Mother Divine, make thy way plain to me, and
guide me on the path.
Before that year (1907)
ended, she would meet Harold Pickett at Meadville, where she traded a
series of lectures on Milton’s Paradise Lost for tuition. As
their love developed, she expressed her concerns:
I
have been spoiled by the affection of great men. It seems strange to
think of loving a man of my own age, one who has not yet faced the
battle I have been fighting these ten years. But the Infinite is
behind him, and we can be sincere with each other, I believe. It
would be glorious to grow on with him, and nourish the greatness in
him, and sometimes to be the child I have never expressed, and rest
in his love. I think he is brave enough to leave me free in my work,
and to support me in it. Help me, dear Mother, to be patient, and if
it is to be another renunciation, to be strong.
The final page in her
diary of that 1907-08 winter is in Harold’s handwriting:
The
intimations of thy heart, dear soul, and the deeply implanted
yearnings for a man’s love and leading, are now in process of
fulfillment. The house beautiful—our home—is being
built—daily—hourly is being framed, not by hands, but out
of the beautiful self-consecration and surrender of our lives to the
divine process of home-making the eternal process to which the Divine
Father-Mother calleth us. Blessed be our Togetherness! Inspirational
our daily living! Upbuilding, our constant communion!
They were married on
Easter Sunday, 1908, and spent a summer-long honeymoon tenting on the
banks of the Esopus River at her family’s farm in Kingston, NY,
while awaiting Harold’s first call to a church.
May,
1908 Yesterday was the dear one’s birthday and I gave him
myself more fully than ever yet. He called me his birthday gift. It
seems truly that I belong to no other soul in the world but him. My
love has never been accepted by any other, for no one else has
understood me. How many times I have passed the gate of renunciation
and fought the great battle of the soul that loves. The nearest souls
have not understood and never can. There is no other personal hold
for my life in this world save Harold. God grant us many years of
companionship. We are both wondrous—loved of many—but
still solitary were it not for each other. Mother Divine, I thank
thee for all gifts and all trials. I have no need of any earthly
thing. My Heaven is in the soul thou has given me for companion. Out
of our union shall come a new earth to embody thee. We consecrate our
beings to thy will.
The young couple began
their lifelong ministries to Unitarian congregations with his
settlement at Sandwich, Massachusetts, in 1909, soon followed by a
stint in Boise, Idaho. Anita’s presence was always a strong one
in his pastorates, these first two and, later, the East Lexington,
Hudson, Peabody and Woburn, Massachusetts churches. While in Boise,
she cast her first vote and says:
In
Idaho, women have all the privileges of citizenship and the
responsibilities...It was indeed a great experience.. .1 hope it will
not be long before the citizens of Massachusetts will enact an equal
suffrage law that women there may have the right to take their true
place in public affairs.
Anita finally took her
true place as an ordained minister when the call came from the Rowe,
Massachusetts, church to its summer ministry—a post which she
held from 1921 until 1925. A newspaper report from Woburn,
Massachusetts, reported on her ordination:
An
unusual ceremony, never before performed in Woburn and rarely if ever
experienced in the annals of the Unitarian church will be solemnized
here Sunday night when Mrs. Anita Trueman Pickett, wife of the pastor
of the Unitarian church, will be ordained in her husband’s
church and by a woman clergyman.. .with her husband as one of the
officiating clergymen....Rev. Florence Buck, D. D., a woman connected
with the AUA headquarters in Boston, will conduct the ordination
ceremonies. Ordination could have been conferred on Mrs. Pickett at
any time, her qualifications having been sufficient to entitle her to
admittance to the list of the clergy... .The ordination of a woman is
a ceremony rarely witnessed and there has never been a case in the
knowledge of Woburn Unitarians where the wife of the pastor had ever
been ordained in the church of which her husband was pastor and at
which he participated
After her ordination in
1921, while she was minister in charge at the Rowe church, she was
instrumental in starting Rowe Camp and Conference Center. The winters
saw her filling the pulpit at Barnard Memorial Church. The rest of
the Picketts’ ministerial careers were spent in Massachusetts
churches. They held joint pastorates at Medfield and Walpole in
1926-1928. The year 1930 found Harold settled at the Nantucket
church, while Anita held the fort at Barnstable and later, Bedford.
They served jointly at Dighton and Eastondale in 1942. After his
death in 1950, she stayed on until 1952 in the church at Ware, where,
since 1947, they had served their last ministry together.
During those busy
years, she continued to lecture and preach widely at other
churches and venues,
while raising her three children—two daughters and a son—
and living the demanding dual roles of minister and minister’s
wife. All the while, she had to fight for recognition as a woman in
an “old boys’ network.”
Anita’s diaries
record her struggles to balance her several demanding lives:
minister, minister’s wife, mother, lecturer, spiritual leader,
feminist, peace worker, youth leader, writer. There are still echoes
of the young idealist and romanticist in these entries, but they are
modulated by maturity and life experience. Still she railed against
the practical demands and the circumscriptions of marriage and
family:
How
I hunger sometimes for the chance to live the full professional life,
to organize my time in the service of the work I can do well...
The
dining room (in 1923-24) is converted into a study, pro tem, and I
have been dropping into the professional attitude between jobs:
getting out reports, planning calendars, preparing sermon outlines,
reading— how I enjoy all this! Some day I promise myself I
shall earn more time for this work, but I am very slow about my
domestic duties, so that I’m hardly settled at my typewriter
before some other call comes and I must leave the work I can do best
in order to blunder through the work that I’m not fitted for.
Yet I love doing all these domestic things and hope always to have a
home to do them in.
An oft-repeated phrase
in times of depression and discouragement was: “Ebb, ocean of
life, the flow will come.”
Anita fought the
exclusion she suffered as a woman minister:
People
persisted in presenting me as the minister’s wife, which is
funny. In Peabody they do the same thing, but with more reason. Once
when the Tolls and ourselves were in a party, someone remarked about
having three ministers along. Another cried, ‘Three? Where are
the three ministers?’ and had to be reminded of my right to the
title. But the title counts little compared to the privilege of doing
the work.
What
is one to do? Condemnation awaits the minister’s wife who is
not an active worker in her husband’s church, but if she is
active, she is criticized for ‘running things.’ But woe
betide the minister’s wife, who being forbidden a sphere of
service in her husband’s church, gives such service outside his
parish....how I wish we might have 2 separate but adjacent churches.
Harold
is attending a meeting of the liberal ministers in Essex County to
arrange an association. It is hard not to feel “wrathy”
about this being arranged to exclude the two women ministers in the
county. I do not think the occasion will pass without some
recognition of the error, but it is surprising with what consistency
the brethren forget to remember us, even if they do not consciously
ignore us., (the host on this occasion) has invited “the men”
to the Salem Club where women are not allowed, and I suspect that
restriction is a convenient excuse for excluding us....
In spite of their
marriage having weathered many serious storms (the diaries
chronicling those episodes were destroyed), about which she made
veiled allusions as well as outright complaints, Anita praised and
rejoiced in her marriage and her husband, as he did in her. In 1913
he wrote in his diary: “Our 5th wedding anniversary had a big
cake to celebrate it. Our happiest days seem to be the newest ones.
God has blessed us more than thought can know, or tongue
express—Estelle, Trueman, Laurel—these three dear sweet
blessings name our riches and token our joys.” And in 1928,
Anita wrote:
Twenty
years have passed, and how richly they have justified all the dreams
of those old days. Was ever woman more blessed than I have been? The
love I longed for came to me in the richest possible measure, yet did
not separate me from the work for which I was born. The motherhood I
craved has been richly fulfilled.., and now I am about to enter on a
new phase of family experience, as a grandmother... .this year,
Harold and I will probably be alone together, and no newlyweds ever
took more joy in each other than we do. After bearing burdens
together, sharing our work, facing deep personal problems, enduring
great tragedies which almost wrecked our home, we have grown together
gloriously....
Harold
and I found our togetherness in sharing our work. In domestic and
business affairs we can seldom agree. It was the work which brought
us together in the first place and it was the work which healed our
differences. Harold gave me my motherhood—the supreme thing in
my life with its extension into two more generations. He is in those
children, grandchildren and great-grandchildren.
Anita’s last
years were impacted by the ill health which had plagued her for most
of her life. After Harold’s death in 1950 and her retirement
from the Ware church, she returned to her family’s homestead,
the oldest stone house in the Lake Katrine section of Kingston. There
she wrote her memoirs, continued to travel and fill guest pulpits,
took care of her younger sister (whose birth defects had kept her
ever
dependent) and
gardened. She wrote, “A garden is good geriatrics. It provides
a mild incentive to continue living. I must be here to see my bulbs
bloom in the Spring.”
Upon her death in 1960,
she willed her home to the then-new Unitarian Fellowship of Ulster
County (flow the Unitarian Universalist Congregation of the
Catskills), of which she was a member.
In the front of Anita’s
journal for 1924-1926 are these words that express her philosophy of
life:
I
am a child of God, My immediate inheritance is divine,
My
immediate environment is Spirit,
I
accept the world as my workshop, my heredity as my tools,
My
environment as the raw material from which to make my life
a
work of art that shall glorify God.
|